Page 40 - COP 2016-2017
P. 40

Steps in evaluation process                   Legitimate:
                                                          This  includes  clear,  open,  transparent  and  sufficiently  inde-
            The System Coordinator is responsible for the assessment of   pendent management structures, ensuring that no parties can
            major suppliers through e.g. research, telephone interviews and   prevent a fair trial during an appeal process.
            supplier visits. From this documentation, a recommendation is
            developed for the CEO to present a decision that takes into   Available:
            account his personal knowledge of the supplier. Finally, the CEO   It should be made public  that  repair  mechanisms exist,  and
            and the System Coordinator conclude whether to initiate any   there  should  be  an  appropriate  assistance  offered  to  the
            changes.                                      wronged parties if access to the  mechanisms can be hindered
                                                          by e.g. language, illiteracy, lack of insight or financing, physical
            Recommendations based on our supplier evaluation are   distance, disability or fear of reprisals.
            communicated to our partner and an agreement is made in
            which appropriate actions are determined – all of which are to   Foreseeable:
            be carried out before the next assessment is made. Where it is   There should be clear and written procedures, a clear period
            considered appropriate to determine a possible cooperation,   for each stage of complaint and clarity in terms of the types of
            screening is always supplemented with visits to the supplier.   processes and results, which can be provided as well as those that
            However, this has not yet been necessary.     cannot be provided, and a way to monitor the implementation
                                                          of each result.

            Processes for remedial action                 Fair:
                                                          Wronged  parties  should  have  access  to  the  sources  of  in-
            Despite  solid  implementation  of  due  diligence,  complaint/  formation, advice and expertise that are necessary to engage
            grievance  issues  may  present  themselves.  United  Nations   in a fair appeal process. Processes should be in accordance
            Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights require that   with internationally recognized standards for human rights with
            companies have processes in place for dealing with complaints   regard to outcomes and remedies.
            as  well  as  for  implementing  remedial  measures.  For  these
            processes to be effective, the following specifications are set.   Clear and transparent:
            This description is also included in the manual for the voluntary   Although confidentiality is sometimes appropriate, the process
            guidance standard ISO 26000 (DS 49001 – the Danish standard   and the result should be sufficiently open to public scrutiny and
            for Social Responsibility and Human Rights).  should balance the public interest properly.

                                                          Dialogue and meditation:
                                                          The process should aim for solutions to be agreed in reciprocity
                                                          through the involvement of the parties.

                                                          If conviction is desired, the parties should seek this through
                                                          separate, independent entities.








            40    |    Phoenix Design Aid  CSR Report  Communication on Progress 2016-2017
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45